Skip to content
Home » Programs & Events » Mid-Semester Group Instructional Feedback Technique (GIFT) Program

Mid-Semester Group Instructional Feedback Technique (GIFT) Program

A circular graphic showing a feedback loop enclosing conversation bubbles with a gift ribbon attached to the loop. The text Mid-Semester Group Instructional Feedback Technique (GIFT) surrounds the loop.

The Mid-Semester Group Instructional Feedback Technique, or GIFT, is an evidence-based practice that provides instructors with actionable feedback to improve the quality of a course (see References). A GIFT is intentionally conducted mid-semester to allow time for adjustments that will improve student learning.

To conduct a GIFT, a member of the CTLI staff visits a class, interviews students, and reports back to the instructor. Sometimes referred to as a Small Group Instructional Diagnosis, this process provides timely formative feedback to the instructor and engages students in reflection on their own learning.

This CTLI service begins with a discovery conversation with an instructor, which helps the CTLI consultant identify the focus of the GIFT.

Conducted during the middle portion of the semester, the GIFT takes 30-45 minutes of class time wherein the CTLi staff consultant guides a three-step feedback process:

  1. Students are asked to respond individually to three questions:
    • What helps your learning in this course? 
    • What hinders your learning in this course? 
    • What suggestions do you have to improve your learning in this course? 
  2. Small groups of students share their answers verbally and then in writing.
  3. The CTLI staff consultant then facilitates a whole class discussion, seeking clarification and consensus.

After the GIFT, the consultant meets with the instructor to discuss the feedback and also shares a short written report that includes dominant themes from the consultation, the comprehensive set of student feedback, consultant observations, and consultant recommendations. The report is a confidential document intended for the instructor’s use only. The CTLI recommends being prepared to comment on the results to the students in the first or second class period after receiving the report, and then implement desired changes as soon as possible.

In the final two weeks of the semester, after an instructor has completed the GIFT process, they will receive an email from the CTLI inviting them to share a reflection on their experience of the GIFT, including any changes they made or intend to make as a result of the feedback. They will also be invited to provide their students with an opportunity to give feedback on the program.

A GIFT is best utilized by new faculty as well as faculty exploring a specific innovation or innovative approach to their teaching. The GIFT is confidential and unrelated to formal evaluation of faculty (and it is not a substitute for peer or Dean observations).

The CTLI piloted the GIFT program in Spring 2026 with a four faculty; while we do not yet have formal feedback, informal response has been very positive.

We are now collecting information about who is interested in participating in the fall semester. Class visits will take place in late October.

Bowden, D. (2004). Small Group Instructional Diagnosis: A Method for Enhancing Writing Instruction. WPA: Writing Program Administration – Journal of the Council of Writing Program Administrators, Fall2004, volume 28, issue 1/2, pages 115-135 (21p).

Finelli, C. J., Ott, M., Gottfried, A. C., Hershock, C., O’Neal, C., & Kaplan, M. (2008). Utilizing instructional consultations to enhance the teaching performance of engineering faculty. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(4), 397–411.

Herman, J. H., & Langridge. (2012). Using small group individual diagnosis to improve online instruction. To Improve the Academy: A Journal of Educational Development, 31. http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/tia.17063888.0031.019

Hurney, C. A., Rener, C. M., & Troisi, J. D. (2022). Midcourse correction for the college classroom: Putting small group instructional diagnosis to work. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003446026

O’Neal-Hixson, K., Long, J., & Bock, M. (2017). The eSGID process: How to improve teaching and learning in online graduate courses. Journal of Effective Teaching, 17(2), 45–57.

Taylor, R. L., Knorr, K., Ogrodnik, M., & Sinclair, S. (2025). Exploring immediate and sustained changes in teaching practices following midterm student feedback. Teaching & Learning Inquiry: The ISSOTL Journal, 13. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.13.30