Skip to content
Home » Teaching with Technology » Generative AI » Teaching in the Age of Generative AI: The Minimum Faculty Should Do

Teaching in the Age of Generative AI: The Minimum Faculty Should Do

Experts and pundits all agree that genAI is here to stay. We are in a period of rapid growth and development driven by tech companies eager to lead the way while governments consider what kinds of regulation are needed. Given the proliferation of tools, public consumption of this technology has been widespread and all sectors of the economy are adopting genAI. Some of these uses of genAI will fizzle while others gain traction. Without a doubt, the world we are preparing students to thoughtfully and productively contribute to will have genAI integrated, which means that faculty in higher education, even if reluctantly, need to become familiar with this technology and its implications for their disciplines.

Students will be forevermore living, learning, and working in a world where this kind of sophisticated technology exists (in fact, we can likely assume this is a baseline from which improvements will come). What do they need to know about the limits and possibilities of it? How is genAI showing up or likely to be used in the professions into which your students enter? While none of us has completely clear answers, a college classroom is a great place to begin the dialogue and raise questions about ethics, bias in AI, developing skills vs using a tool, reliance on technology, quality of output, etc.

Perhaps this is obvious but, nonetheless, worth stating: Your strength, which genAI will never have, is your humanity – your ability to connect with students, to mentor students, to facilitate interaction between students, to provide accountability and contextualized feedback, and to bring expert insight and analysis to a learning environment. These strengths are all foundational to help students learn responsible, ethical, and productive use of genAI (along with knowing when to not use it).

There are several steps you can take to build your fluency with genAI and set yourself up for teaching success.

The CTLI recommends using Copilot, Microsoft’s large language model, with your VSC login. As you experiment with genAI tools, track your questions, reactions, concerns, insights, and ideas. Consider what it means, in your discipline, to use genAI effectively and ethically. You may even want to experiment with using genAI for teaching-related tasks, such as brainstorming icebreaker activities, writing case studies, or generating drafts of low-stakes quiz questions.

And most importantly, never upload student work without their permission or materials that would violate FERPA student privacy regulations.

  1. Navigate to Microsoft Copilot in a browser, and click “Sign In.”  Note: Signing in with your VSC credentials is essential for data protection and privacy that you would not have using the publicly available version of Copilot or other generative AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Claude, Perplexity, etc.) 
  1. If you aren’t already logged in with your browser, choose “Continue with Microsoft” and if your VSC account hasn’t been previously entered, type your email using the @vsc.edu version. Otherwise, click on your VSC account. 
  1. Enter your prompt into the dialogue box in the center of the page. Experiment with prompting. While you may want to simply trust your intuition and experiment, you may also want to try using a prompt engineering framework. For instance, the CLEAR (concise, logical, explicit, adaptive, reflective) framework provides guidance for inputting prompts and evaluating output. Check out the VSCS Libraries’ page with more information and examples for using the CLEAR framework

Additionally, Ethan Mollick and Lilach Mollick (of UPenn’s Wharton School) created a 45-minute, 5-part video tutorial series titled “Practical AI for Instructors and Students.” Dr. Mollick and Dr. Mollick clearly wholeheartedly embrace genAI in higher education; you may have more hesitation or concerns about its value or utility. However, we think that this tutorial series is a good place to begin if you are brand new or relatively novice to genAI, with information and suggestions for practicing with genAI.

  1. Part 1: Introduction to AI for Instructors and Students
  2. Part 2: Large Language Models
  3. Part 3: Prompting AI
  4. Part 4: AI for Teachers
  5. Part 5: AI for Students

It is important to have a course-level policy (either written by you or co-written by you and your students) about genAI usage.

Students will be experiencing a range of expectations across their courses, so it is also important to talk with students about why you are making particular decisions about genAI usage in your course.

We recommend creating a genAI course-level policy that falls into one of three categories:

  • Integrated (Green Light). This course’s generative AI policy acknowledges the use of AI is an essential skill in today’s world. By using genAI for specific purposes, students become equipped with relevant skills and tools necessary to thrive in a technology-driven society. With this type of course-level policy, you will want to be explicit about if/how students are expected to indicate their use of genAI including citations. It is also important to help students learn how to evaluate genAI output for accuracy and validity, particularly as hallucinations (made up information or citations) are common with genAI. Consider whether you want students to include copies of their AI chats with assignments they submit where they used AI for assistance or whether you would like them to reflect on the output provided by any genAI tools.
  • Allowed (Yellow Light). This course’s generative AI policy acknowledges technology, including generative AI, plays a supportive role in learning and feedback. You may have particular assignments or steps of assignments where genAI usage is encouraged and others where it is banned. Communicate clearly when and why those delineation are made. Similar to an unrestricted use case, be explicit about whether and how students are expected to indicate genAI assistance and use citations.
  • Prohibited (Red Light). The use of generative AI is not allowed in this course, with the exception of spellcheck, grammar check and similar tools. This type of policy will be most difficult to monitor and enforce. It is therefore especially important to explain to students how genAI use would negatively impact their learning, substantiating the policy.

The University of Nebraska-Lincoln’s Center for Transformative Teaching has shared sample syllabus statements in these three categories with similar names.


Explore related pages on the topic of Generative AI.