Skip to content
Home » Teaching Effectiveness » Curricular Alignment » Fink’s Significant Learning

Fink’s Significant Learning

One of the first tasks teachers face when designing a course is deciding what they want students to learn or get out of their course. Students will always learn something, but good teachers want their students to learn something important or significant, rather than something relatively insignificant. This leads to a question that is key to the whole teaching enterprise: What are the ways in which learning can be significant? If we have or can develop a language and a conceptual framework for identifying the multiple ways in which learning can be significant, then teachers can decide which of various kinds of significant learning they want to support and promote in a given course or learning experience.

It was with this thought in mind that Fink worked on and eventually put together a new taxonomy of learning, one that is called a “Taxonomy of Significant Learning”.

Individuals and organizations involved in higher education are expressing a need for important kinds of learning that do not emerge easily from the Bloom taxonomy, for example: learning how to learn, leadership and interpersonal skills, ethics, communication skills, character, tolerance, the ability to adapt to change, etc. Fink’s interpretation of these statements is that they are expressing a need for new kinds of learning, kinds that go well beyond the cognitive domain of Bloom’s taxonomy and even beyond cognitive learning itself. This suggests that the time may have arrived when we need a new and broader taxonomy of significant learning.

To return to the original question, “What is significant learning?” the answer being offered here is: Any learning that consists of one or more of the following kinds of learning:

  • Foundational Knowledge
  • Application Learning
  • Integration
  • The Human Dimension of Learning
  • Caring
  • Learning How to Learn

And, the more that these kinds of learning occur, the more significant the learning experience is. In fact, the most significant kind of learning experience is one in which students achieve all six kinds of significant learning.

In the process of constructing this taxonomy, Fink was guided by a particular perspective on learning: He defined learning in terms of change. For learning to occur, there has to be some kind of change in the learner. No change, no learning. And significant learning requires that there be some kind of lasting change that is important in terms of the learner’s life. With this perspective in mind, Fink created a taxonomy that includes six kinds of significant learning: Foundational Knowledge, Application, Integration, Human Dimension, Caring, and Learning How to Learn.

At the base of most other kinds of learning is the need for students to “know” something. Knowing, as used here, refers to students’ ability to understand and remember specific information and ideas. It is important for people today to have some valid basic knowledge, for example, about science, history, literature, geography, etc. They also need to understand major ideas or perspectives, for example, what evolution is (and what it is not), what capitalism is (and is not), and so forth. Special Value: Foundational Knowledge provides the basic understanding that is necessary for other kinds of learning.

This familiar kind of learning occurs when students learn how to engage in some new kind of action, which may be intellectual, physical, social, etc. Learning how to engage in various kinds of thinking (critical, creative, practical) is an important form of application learning. But this category of significant learning also includes developing certain skills (e.g., communication, playing the piano) or learning how to manage complex projects. Special Value: Application learning allows other kinds of learning to become useful.

When students are able to see and understand the connections between different things, an important kind of learning has occurred. Sometimes they make connections between specific ideas, between whole realms of ideas, between people, and/or between different realms of life (e.g., between school and work or between school and leisure life). Special Value: The act of making new connections gives learners a new form of power, especially intellectual power.

When students learn something important about their own Self and/or about Others, it enables them to interact more effectively with themselves or with others. They discover the personal and/or social implications of what they have learned. What they learn or the way in which they learn sometimes gives students a new understanding of themselves (self-image) or a new vision of what they want to become (self-ideal). At other times, they acquire a better understanding of others: how and why others act the way they do, or how the learner can interact more effectively with others. Special Value: This kind of learning informs students about the human significance of what they are learning.

Sometimes a learning experience changes’ the degree to which students care about something. This may be reflected in the form of new feelings, interests, and/or values. Any of these changes means students now care about something to a greater degree or in a way than they did before. Special Value: When students care about something, they then have the energy they need for learning more about it and making it a part of their lives. Without the energy for learning, nothing significant happens.

This occurs when students learn something about the process of learning itself. They may be learning how to be a better student, how to engage in a particular kind of inquiry (e.g., the scientific method), or how to become self-directing learners. All of these constitute important forms of learning how to learn. Special Value: This kind of learning enables students to continue learning in the future and to do so with greater effectiveness.

When writing outcomes at any level (program, course, lesson, etc.), it is important that an action verb is included to accurately describe the level and type of learning to be demonstrated.

Check out this page of Useful Verbs for Significant Learning, which provides examples that articulate and distinguish learning across the six domains.

One important feature of this taxonomy is that it is not hierarchical but rather relational and even interactive. This interactive characteristic is important for teachers because it means the various kinds of learning are synergistic. And this in turn means that teaching is no longer a ‘zero sum” game. That is, teachers don’t automatically have to give up one kind of learning in order to achieve another. Instead, when a teacher finds a way to help students achieve one kind of learning, this can in fact enhance, not decrease, student achievement in the other kinds of learning. For example, if a teacher finds a way to help students learn how to effectively use the information and concepts in a course to solve certain kinds of problems (Application learning), this makes it easier for them to get excited about the value of the subject (Caring). Or, when students learn how to effectively relate this subject to other ideas and subjects (Integration), this makes it easier for students to see the significance of the course material for themselves and for others (Human dimension). When a course or learning experience is able to promote all six kinds of learning, one has had a learning experience that can truly be deemed “significant.”

Download Link: https://ctli.vermontstate.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/guidetocoursedesignaug05.pdf

Citation: What is “Significant Learning”?. Dr. L. Dee Fink, Director, Instructional Development Program, University of Oklahoma. Adapted from https://ctli.vermontstate.edu/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/what-is-significant-learning.pdf.